Subscribe Online  


Raw TV on taking The Imposter to the movies

Raw TV's md Dimitri Doganis and creative director Bart Layton, best known for long running TV series Banged Up Abroad and Gold Rush, explain how and why they took their doc, The Imposter to the movies

The Imposter tells the story of how a 23-year-old Frenchman, Frederic Bourdin convinced a Texas family that he was their missing 16-year-old son. The feature doc, directed by Bart Layton and produced by Dimitri Doganis,  has played at festivals around the world and gets a UK cinema release in August

What was the biggest leap when moving from TV docs to theatrical?
DD It's a different business model, a different visual sensibility, a different way of structuring story and pacing. It's also about the engagement with the life of this thing after it's finished. That's still something we're coming to grips with. Television is a very ephemeral thing; a film keeps requiring your involvement.

How was it different to TV in terms of structure?
BL On TV you've got five minutes at the beginning and if you haven't smashed the audience with something amazing you may not have them for the rest of the time. With this I wanted people to go on a journey where it took them quite some time to find out where they were in the story and what was happening. Documentary is usually about finding a definitive version of the truth, but there were conflicting versions of the same events. I wanted to take the audience on a similar journey we went on so the audience member is part of that detective story.

Did that inform the dramatic elements of the film?
DD It's made in a slightly hyper-real space, slightly floaty camera work and slightly off kilter shutter speeds. People talk to you in the re-enactments and you often see the actor lip-synching the interview.
BL It's not presented as fake archive or as an established truth. The drama is an extension of the storytelling – one person's subjective take. The key to it was to make it not look like reality but somewhere between movie, memory and documentary.

Were these techniques you could have used on TV?
BL To do that you have to bring in an amazing DoP and storyboard artist – people who we don't historically have the budget or time for on TV.

Did the story itself demand a theatrical doc?
DD From the first time Bart told me about the story we both knew this was different from all the stuff we spend our day to day working lives on. There was the opportunity to do something bigger and bolder and the story required that. We then risked a lot of our time and money to get it made. We gambled a lot on the fact that it would work for theatrical. We were always determined we were going to make it as a film whether we'd got the money from the places we did or not. It felt like everything we'd been doing for the last ten years had been building to this opportunity.

Has making it been worthwhile?
DD The glory of being truly independent is you get to make decisions that may seem slightly insane but actually it’s my belief that they are the best decisions you can make. If you look at the amount of time as individuals and as a company we’ve sunk into this film it’s a complete loss maker but it's the best thing we've ever done. And, I believe, the stepping-stone into a whole new realm of possibilities that would have been closed to us before.

Posted 21 August 2012 by Jon Creamer

Our War 2: behind the scenes

Bafta winner Our War told the story of the British troops in Afghanistan through the soldiers’ own footage. Exec producer Colin Barr tells Jon Creamer about returning to the frontline for series two

How do you begin the process?
We go out and meet lots of different regiments and soldiers and we gather footage from those soldiers on hard drives and memory sticks. You're looking for blocks of material you think can be constructed into stories and once you hit those blocks, then that's the platform on which we"ll build the story. Then you go into your research and do the interviews that hold the whole thing together.

What's the production model for the series?
The production model is quite different to a conventional doc because the emphasis is so heavily on the editing side of things and much lighter on the filming side. And it's front loaded at the research end when we’re trying to find the footage that will inspire the films. In the first series we learned just how long you have to allow in the edit to weave together material that was never intended for broadcast with the interviews to make it feel coherent and solid and dramatic.

Is there any way to plan the stories beforehand?
We tried in the first series to do assemblies and to get ahead of ourselves before the edits but the reality is, until you've got the director and the editor in a room together trying to shape the thing a lot of that work is wasted.

Is it difficult to understand what you're watching when you first see the footage?
A lot of the time you've no idea what the context is. Soldiers aren't marking up their files as such so you have to go back and challenge them a bit and say "are you sure this is filmed this day and in this place because it doesn't look like it?" You then go through two or three different sources to find out when something was filmed and there's no shortcut to that. You just have to go through the laborious process of asking and asking again.

Does the technical quality of some of the footage preclude its use?
If the story is right and the characters are good then the technical quality of the material doesn’t affect us at all. Sometimes, with the way cameras are now, it can almost look too good and it doesn't look like helmet-cam footage any more. It's almost too pristine, the colours are almost too vivid. Sometimes that's good but sometimes it's distracting. With the GoPros they're using now, the sound isn't great but the picture quality is incredible.

What's the clearance process with the MOD?
We inform the regiment and the MOD about who we're filming etc, so there's a relationship there. At rough-cut stage they can view it but only to comment on issues of operational or personal security. There's a red flag system so if there's something they feel is going to jeopardise operations or put soldiers lives at risk, they can red flag it and we discuss it and they then have to prove their case. If it's proved we'll take that out but editorially they don't have any say at all.

And what about with the soldiers and their families?
We have viewings throughout with families and individual soldiers. Consent is such a rolling process. Everybody at every stage has to consent and if that breaks down then we can't broadcast so we need to make sure.

Have you learned lessons from making the last series?
We're more focussed because we've got a better sense of what we're looking for. What we need is a core cast of characters and a single narrative if we can get it.

What else did you do differently this time?
Part of what you do differently is the storytelling techniques you use but also the voices you find and the framing devices you use. You learn so much in a first series so we know now what works best. The last series had films with two or three different strands in them and it worked but it's never as good as having a single narrative.

Is this found-footage technique very different from traditional documentary?
As more and more people use UGC, people are always asking does this change the way we tell stories or does it mean old-fashioned doc makers have had their day? Actually, the opposite is true. When you start working with material like this you realise how much you resort to classic doc techniques and storytelling devices. You have to work harder at making the elements work because they don't naturally work. You have to grind them into a powder just keep cutting and cutting until they work together. It's almost as if it makes those traditional skills even more important.

BBC3's Our War used a combination of frontline troops' own amateur footage along with interviews with those same soldiers to take viewers right into the heart of battle. The second three parter hones more new stories from a vast mountain of amateur footage.
TX 13 August
Production company BBC inhouse
Length 3x60-minutes
Executive producer Colin Barr
John Douglas
Tom Herington
Katharine English
Editor Reva  Childs
Dan Reed
Editor Peter Haddon
Commissioned by
BBC3 controller 
Zai Bennett
Associate producer 
Roger Courtiour
Production manager
Michelle Galvin
Assistant producers
Hayley Reynolds, Anna Stephens
Media manager
Nathan Carr
Compost Creative
Chad Hodson
Narrated by
Shaun Dooley

Posted 21 August 2012 by Jon Creamer
Showing 1 - 2 Records Of 2

About this Author

  • Editor Of Televisual
  • Total Posts: 2

Recent Posts by This Author



Televisual Media UK Ltd 23 Golden Square, London, W1F 9JP
©2009 - 2017 Televisual. All rights reserved
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use | Disclaimer