Subscribe Online  


The Voice's Moira Ross on the art of entertainment TV

Moira Ross, the exec producer of The Voice UK and head of entertainment at Wall to Wall, on the art of producing entertainment shows.

Entertainment series like The Voice and Strictly are such big shows, that you need to have a broader vision for them. It’s important to set a strong tone.
You have to step back and look at the bigger picture and think, how do I want people to feel on Saturday night when they are watching it? I want them to feel they are part of it and can relate to it. I also like to have a laugh. I want to bring out the humour and the humanity.
The trend has been to edit things in a really safe way or go for this faux jeopardy. But I like to see if we can get something funnier, or make it warmer and softer. I’ll ask, is it making me laugh, is it cheeky?
Jeopardy is an old-fashioned entertainment concept now. If it is not real, it shouldn’t be in there.
Casting is what takes a show up to the next level. It is the people who make a show.
Kylie is naturally really warm, and is a feminine addition to The Voice. Ricky brings us wit – he’s an everyman and is down to earth. They have both broadened the tone of the show and and Tom are enjoying working with them too. There’s a great rapport and humour between them all.

We have so much footage that we couldn’t squeeze into the series of all the judges dancing in the studio in-between performances. They love music and they’re in an environment that’s all about music with a live band and great singers. And if they are having a good time, you have a good time watching it. The more smiles that happen on screen, the more you smile at home as viewer.
It’s a fun job. I could be doing much worse jobs than hanging out in the studio listening to Will’s jokes!
I hate emails. I would much rather have a meeting. I don’t want to sit doing emails when I could be having a conversation.

There’s a lot of pressure on The Voice, because it’s a Saturday night show. It’s the shop window to BBC One, so all eyes are on it.
It takes someone who is quite patient to do this job. And you’ve got to be someone who really likes people, who wants to see them to do well - from the people on the team, the stars in the chairs, to the singers who audition. I am really passionate about that and love the team I work with – they have been with me for years now! We want contestants to have a fun and positive experience on the show and I think you can really see that every week.

The Voice UK crowns its winner for 2014 on Saturday 5 April, live on BBC One.

Posted 26 March 2014 by Tim Dams

Interview: Patrick Holland, Boundless

When Patrick Holland took over as md of Boundless in 2012, he inherited some of the biggest factual TV series in Britain: The Apprentice, Grand Designs, Escape to the Country, Great Railway Journies and Four Rooms. It’s a slate that most indie bosses would give their right arm for. But it’s also one that presents huge challenges. 

It’s Holland’s job to keep these long runners fresh, to keep the viewers tuned in – and to keep them onscreen. In this respect, he’s had success – The Apprentice, for example, is now shooting series 10, while Grand Designs is commissioned through until 2016.  Escape to the Country is about to air its 600th edition.

Boundless has achieved the holy grail of indie TV production – a supply of long running series that underpin the business. But, stresses Holland, you can’t take this longevity for granted in the television industry. “The reason they had become such extraordinary real estate was because of the care, skill and creativity that had gone into those series.”

Keeping The Apprentice fresh almost 10 years on, he says, comes down to finding the right team to run it. After series eight, he promoted series editor Cate Hall to exec producer. Huge effort was also put into casting series nine, as well as creating tasks that catch the zeitgeist. He also cites Lord Sugar’s commitment to the series. “Working with him keeps you on your toes. I think we have developed a good relationship.”

Holland has had to balance producing Boundless’ long running slate, though, with a search for more returning features and factual entertainment shows of his own to build up the business further.  In this too, despite hiccups like the poorly received The Intern for Channel 4, Holland has had success. Turnover is up to £27.6m last year, from £23.8m in 2012.

He says there are series in development with Channel 4 and BBC1 which look promising. Other recent series commissions include My Kitchen Rules for Sky Living as well as fledgling format World’s Toughest Jobs for BBC3. This month, BBC1 aired a new specialist factual commission, An Hour to Save Your Life. All, he hopes, might have the potential to turn into long runners.

Holland says the market for high-end factual is vibrant at the moment – albeit hugely competitive.

In particular, it’s very difficult to land a big factual entertainment series. “For the last five years, everyone in British TV has been saying, ‘Where is the next Apprentice’. But no one has come up with it.”

Commissioners, he says, view factual entertainment as “really, really risky,” as there’s great concern that viewers might not buy into a format from the start. That said, Holland thinks that “authenticity” is the big trend in television at the moment. Viewers, he says, want to hear extraordinary, real stories and not to feel boxed in by a strongly formatted show. After all, the big hits of recent times – Gogglebox, Educating Yorkshire or 24 Hours in A&E – are essentially ob docs. To back up his point, Holland cites long runner Grand Designs, exec produced by Fiona Caldwell. Boundless has tried to make the series less formatted, so that it now breathes like a filmic observational documentary. “The build is almost the backdrop to the human story,” he says.

Meanwhile, Holland’s other big challenge has been to create recognition for Boundless. The indie was born in 2011 after parent company Fremantle Media UK broke up its production giant Talkback Thames into five different labels – Boundless (factual), Retort (scripted comedy), Talkback (comedy entertainment), Thames (entertainment) and Newman Street (drama).  Fremantle Media UK CEO Sara Geater’s plan was to emulate indie groups like All3Media or Shed, which have creative, entrepreneurial producers running their own labels in the group while sharing back office functions such as legal, business affairs and press.

Industry talk now centres on whether Fremantle is going to buy All3Media. Holland won’t comment on the issue, but says if it did happen he wouldn’t feel any sense of threat. If anything it would validate the entrepreneurial producer model that now characterises Boundless’s relationship with Fremantle.

In the meantime, Boundless is pushing outwards. For example, it’s branching into specialist factual with shows like An Hour To Save Your Life, BBC1’s Talk to the Animals and BBC2’s Essex Bangers. Holland says traditional factual genres are now blurring to such an extent that a lot of the bigger companies are making specialist factual, which was once the preserve of smaller, niche indies. “What commissioners want now is new ways of telling stories.” And producers like Boundless, reckons Holland, can bring their experience to bear in the genre from big shows like The Apprentice or Grand Designs.

Nevertheless, the ambition at Boundless remains the same, whatever the genre, says Holland. “We want to tell the best factual stories in the best possible way.”

Age 45
Education Newport Free Grammar School, Essex; Emanuel College, Cambridge (Philosophy); Sussex Unversity (Philosophy MA)
Holland’s first job was a trainee researcher at indie TVF, working on Everyman and Equinox films. From there he went to Twenty Twenty to work on Big Story.  He then joined the BBC’s Modern Times as an AP, where Stephen Lambert gave him his first film to make. He went with Lambert to join RDF, directing Looking for Dad, A Very British Murder, The Case of Tony Martin and Faking It. Holland then ran C4’s new talent scheme The Other Side with Charlotte Moore at IWC, and later went to Ricochet as exec producer before becoming director of factual in 2010. He joined Boundless as md in 2012.

Posted 25 March 2014 by Tim Dams

How UK producers have cracked the US TV market

It all began back in the late 1990s. The phenomenal success of pioneering British formats in the United States, like Who Wants to be a Millionaire?, Survivor and The Weakest Link, has led to an ever-increasing amount of business between the two countries’ television industries.

This was cemented in the mid-noughties with further success for British formats, like The X Factor, Pop Idol, Wife Swap and Supernanny. And in recent years, British producers have pushed ever further into the US market, selling in original drama like Downton Abbey through to factual shows like America: The Story of US (pictured above) and Undercover Boss. 

Exporting to the US

The US market now accounts for a greater share of British TV exports than ever—up 50% since 2007, to make up almost half, or £475m, of all export revenue last year, according to Pact.

A swathe of British production companies – like Raw TV, Studio Lambert, Blink, Wag TV, Zig Zag and Firecracker – now earn some 50% of their revenues from the US market.

British execs are now a familiar sight in the US television industry. At January’s Realscreen factual market in Washington – a pitching and networking forum for producers to US broadcasters – some 300 of the 2,500 delegates were British. Senior British execs in the US industry include Fox’s head of reality Simon Andreae, ABC’s head of entertainment Paul Lee and NBC’s president of alternative and late night programming Paul Telegdy.

NBC’s senior vice president of alternative programming and development Brandon Riegg – who oversees NBC shows America’s Got Talent, The Biggest Loser and Fear Factor – says: “In LA, I don’t think there is a show we have that doesn’t have a British producer running it or at a senior level. There are a tonne of British TV folk who work in the industry.”

Brits are keen on doing business in the US because it is the largest television market in the world, worth an estimated $37bn (£22bn) a year. The number of buyers – from the key networks through to the niche cable companies – dwarfs the UK market with its handful of commissioning channels, notably the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Sky and Channel 5. By contrast, at Realscreen, some 70 US broadcasters were in town looking to commission content.

Open for business

The Brits are also motivated to do business in the States because of the terms of trade, which 10 years ago handed to producers the rights to their programmes. If producers can translate one of their shows that has aired successfully in the UK to the United States, there is serious money to be made. 

The Americans, for their part, are keen to engage with British producers. The US market is highly competitive, so broadcasters now look all over the world for unique and original content in a bid to secure a hit show.

This open attitude is summed up by Steven Lerner, the vice president of programming for Scripps Networks Interactive brands HGTV and DIY Network. “I don’t care where you are from or what you do, I just want good shows. We are open for business.” 

Proving that programmes are rather more important than the nationality of a production company, Lerner adds: “I can’t even tell you how many productions we have from UK companies because I get mixed up about some of the companies that are in the States. Like Leopard, is that owned by the UK? And Pioneer – I think they are based in the UK.” (Both are indeed UK companies, but with significant US operations: Leopard makes House Hunters International for HGTV, while Pioneer makes Extreme Homes.)

US buyers also like to take as much risk out of the commissioning process as possible. So it’s an advantage for British producers to sell in an idea for a show that has already earned its stripes in the competitive UK market. 

Indeed, being British is a great asset. The UK market, where public service broadcasters have a remit to produce original and innovative programming, is respected in the US for being highly creative and risk taking. British producers say the US market is often more open to them than the UK. Whereas producers can easily get pigeonholed in the UK for making certain kinds of shows, the US is seen as more meritocratic.

Agents and lawyers 

However, doing business in America is different to the UK, say British producers. The difference between the two markets was the subject of panels at both Televisual’s most recent Factual Festival and at the Realscreen conference.

Producers say it’s best to start small in the US, rather than splashing out on an expensive office and high overheads. Firecracker’s Mark Soldinger recalls arriving in LA in 2009 with a suitcase and renting a room from the company’s distribution partner Zodiak, and giving himself six months on the ground to make a success of business in the US. The company, which has US credits including American Gypsy Wedding, now turns over almost 50% of its revenue from the US market. 

But it’s important to partner up either with an agent or established production company if you are not a well-known producer who is looking to break into the United States. 

Described as a “necessary evil”, agents can open doors for producers. They have a good overview of a complex market with dozens of different buyers with different needs. 

Indeed, broadcasters rely on agents to help them filter ideas and set up meetings.

Agents, though, come at a price. They typically take 10% of a producer’s fee for a show. Or, if they package the show, they take 3% of the total budget. Plus, in both cases, 10% of the back end. 

A good lawyer is important too. In the US, every deal is a negotiation. “There are customs but there are no fundamental terms of trade,” says lawyer Richard Hofstetter, partner and co-chairman, Entertainment Group at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC. The lawyer negotiates the terms of the deal, so that every eventuality is covered. For example, the deal could see the network commit to “lock” the producer for the life of a series as opposed to having the option to replace the producer at any year. 

The pitching process
In the UK, it’s seen as very bad form to pitch an idea to multiple broadcasters at the same time. The UK pitching culture is monogamous, with an idea often tailored to a commissioner at a single broadcaster. In the States, by comparison, producers can be far more promiscuous. “You go out to everyone in the space of a week and say, here is what I have got,” says Nutopia chief executive Jane Root. This speeds up the pitching process too, as it means producers don’t have to wait weeks for an idea to be rejected before taking it to another broadcaster. 

A sizzle reel is also crucial to help sell an idea to a US broadcaster. “For us, it’s a question of tape. It’s quite difficult to sell off paper,” says Victoria Fitzpatrick, head of television at Creative Artists Agency, who adds that a “great title helps too.” 

On screen talent, either a celebrity or an outsize and compelling character, also helps sell an idea.

British producers praise US commissioners for their directness in meetings. There is less laborious small talk and decisions are made faster. “There is a wonderful directness about America,” says Root. “People either say yes, that’s great or no, I’m not interested.”

She compares it to the UK, where conversations “can go on for years, literally, before anyone makes a decision.”

Nick Emmerson, chief executive officer, Ricochet UK, adds: “The pitching process is fun there, and sometimes odd. You can set up a tape and show, and some can say absolutely nothing at all – you are out of the room. 

Other times, you can really engage in conversations. Here, when you pitch to Channel 4 or the BBC, it is more of a conversation or dialogue. There, you are on stage. You put on a show and try 
to sell.”

Posted 19 March 2014 by Tim Dams

Lenny Henry: his Bafta Television Lecture in full

Here's the full transcript of the annual Bafta Television Lecture, which was given last night by actor and comedian Lenny Henry.

In the speech, he called for new legislation to reverse the decline in black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) people working in the UK television industry, which he said had fallen by 30.9% between 2006 and 2012.

"Thank you, thank you. My Lords, Ladies, gathered members of the media and my fellow members of BAFTA. My name, as John said, is Lenny Henry - I’m an actor, writer, comedian and producer. In 2008 I was asked to make a speech at the Royal Television Society. My talk covered the history of ethnic minorities in British Television, the story of my own personal journey in the business, and I put forward some suggestions as to how we might make the representation of ethnic minorities a little fairer. At the talk’s conclusion I said, “I hope that things will now change and that I don’t have to come back and repeat myself in another five or six years time.”

Yeah. It’s good to be back people.

I’d just like to give you the background on how this second speech came about. Last year, I watched the BAFTA Awards on TV, and the next evening I went along to the Sony Radio Awards. There I was, going up the red carpet looking forward to a glass of Prosecco and a miniature sausage roll, when this journalist stuck a microphone in my face and asked if I thought the BAFTAs were “a bit vanilla.”

And I went into this riff - like I was in my pyjamas at home, in a gallows humour style about how they had Chiwetel Ejiofor and Sanjeev Bhaskar and David Harewood presenting awards, but there were no Blacks or Asians collecting prizes because it seemed to me there hadn’t been any significant Black or Asian projects made that year. We hadn’t been given the opportunity to write or make or be in anything so we weren’t winning anything. I ran my mouth off, basically, said something like, “it’s gonna be a brand new show, ‘It’ll Be All White On The Night’”. And this was before I’d had the Prosecco.

Next day it was in all the papers, I was getting phone calls, I had to ring BAFTA and say, “BAFTA, I love you guys. No, I think you do a great job. No please don’t stop sending the free movies. I’ve got a deal with the newsagent on the corner. If we could figure out how to stop that caption ‘Property of Bafta” appearing every ten minutes we’d be billionaires.” That, Ladies and Gentlemen, was my call to action. BAFTA, it's all your fault. You are to blame.

So, once again, I’m here today to make a speech about diversity in the British Film and TV industry. I also want to make some observations about my own journey in the business so far, and weigh in with some ideas on how we could and should change things for the future. For those of you who don’t know, and by the way, how many people here weren’t alive in 1975? [Murmurs from audience] Dear God. Back then I got my TV break, as John Willis said, via a show called New Faces. It had an audience of about 16million people every week; it launched people like Victoria Wood. It was kind of like a Britain’s Got Talent for comedians and variety performers, but without Simon Cowell.

So before I begin, let’s look back at what happened since my speech in 2008. Well some broadcasters ‘took action’. They have launched or re-launched various initiatives and training programmes. They created new training schemes for ‘the yout’ from underprivileged backgrounds to enter the industry. They’ve run senior mentoring schemes to ‘help people from diverse backgrounds’ break through the glass ceiling. They’ve even invested in extra monitoring of the problem.

Now I love trainee schemes. I love mentoring. Haven’t you watched every Hollywood buddy police movie? The young whippersnapper cop is teamed up with the older, wiser, white-haired mentor who’s seen it all, done it all and shoots three gangsters every time he goes for coffee and a bagel. We love mentors. I’ve had many over the years. Now there’s been Robin Nash, Jim Moir, Paul Jackson, Geoff Posner, Peter Bennett-Jones, Robert Luff… These people all helped to shape my career at various stages of my life and I’m deeply grateful to them, from my heart I really am. Although where those guys were when I was in the Black and White Minstrels for five years, I’ll never know.

I also love increased monitoring, as that’s how I can tell you the stats and figures that reveal that since my last speech in 2008, despite all those mentoring and training programmes, despite these easy to roll-out solutions, the fact is the situation has deteriorated, badly. Between 2006 and 2012, the number of BAME’s working in the UK TV industry has declined by 30.9%. Creative Skillset conducted a census that shows quite clearly that Black, Asian and minority ethnic representation in the creative industries in 2012 was just 5.4% - its lowest point since they started taking the census. That’s an appalling percentage - more so because the majority of our industry is still based in and around London, right here, where there’s a BAME population of 40%.

Want some more evidence? Here’s another rocket-propelled statistical grenade for you. In the last three years the total number of BAME people in the industry has fallen by 2,000 while the industry as a whole has grown by over 4,000. Or to put it another way - for every black and Asian person who lost their job, more than two white people were employed.

And since 2008 I’ve noticed another worrying trend. Our most talented BAME actors are increasingly frustrated, and they have to go to America to succeed. You know who I’m talking about. David Oyelowo in The Help and The Butler. Idris Elba in Long Walk To Freedom, Prometheus and The Wire. Thandie Newton in Crash, Mission: Impossible. Chewitel Ejiofor in 12 Years A Slave; he was good in American Gangster too. David Harewood in Homeland. Lennie James in The Walking Dead and Jericho. Marianne Jean-Baptiste, Ladies and Gentlemen, our first Black British female Oscar nominee for Secrets & Lies had to go stateside to find work in Without A Trace. Archie Panjabi of course in The Good Wife. All achieved a measure of success here but were frustrated at the lack of opportunity in the UK.

This kind of exodus, this kind of exodus has been happening for a while. I’m going to read an excerpt from a letter now. It refers to the lack of opportunity and prejudice towards minority actors in Britain, and the impetus to go where one is wanted as opposed to the alternative. So, forgive me as I read this.

It says, “I at present enjoy a popularity equal to that of Mr. Edmund Kean in his heyday in England. I have more offers of engagement than I can possibly attend to or fulfil and on the terms of my own dictation, therefore I need not tell you that I have not the slightest idea of returning to England for at least two years, if then, should God spare my life. I have already had five offers from Parisian theatres. Here an actor is estimated according to his ability, and they the artistes are gentlemen generally, and received and treated as such by the public.” This letter was written on March 11th by the black classical actor Ira Aldridge… in 1853. Imagine if he’d had to cope with whoever casts Midsomer Murders. He’d have topped himself.

Black British Oscar-winning filmmaker Steve McQueen –damn, that sounded good, I’m gonna say that again. Black British Oscar… and BAFTA-winning filmmaker, Steve McQueen, director of 12 Years A Slave, has had huge success in the UK and the states with that film and Shame and Hunger. He has been fortunate to have had the backing of Film4, and I’m delighted he has chosen to return to the UK to direct a TV series set in West London, which is good news for us, both as a viewing public and as a workforce who want to be involved with something that just might compete with other high-end drama come BAFTA time.

My point is, we are often told that BAME don’t have the marquee value or star power to drive a feature or long-running series. That’s what we’re told. These performers have demonstrated that this is no longer the case. I don’t want to be too much of a downer – there’s been some change. Idris Elba came back, didn’t he, to make Luther. Yeah boy. A crime series set in a London-like metropolis. Idris plays the title role - an intellectual, troubled, maverick cop who has no black friends or family. [Audience laughter] Not at all, none. Have you seen this? He never has any black mates. You never see him talking to his Uncle Festus or whatever his name is? He’s never down Jerk City having a curry goat and rice with his bredrens. You never see Luther with black people, what’s going on? And he never changes his clothes, what’s that all about? It’s a great show.

Corrie’s BAME presence has increased in the last few years too, but let’s face it, they had to do something didn’t they? For far too long Coronation Street was the only street in the North of England with a corner shop owned by a white family. Indian families’ would be watching at home going, “these people, they’ve taken all our jobs. You can’t go in a post office these days without seeing a white face behind the counter. Something has to change!”

Even Emmerdale had Will Jonson, right on Will, playing Dominic Andrews. He was on Emmerdale Farm, check it out man. A black mechanic and single father, Dominic Andrews has had to cope with school bullying, one night stands, drug deals, teenage pregnancy, abortion and gunshot wounds… and that was just in his first episode. 

But we shouldn’t just look at onscreen portrayal, we should check out what’s happening behind the camera. Now a black former-BBC executive, who’s recently formed his own consultancy company playfully describes the workforce behind the camera as ‘the makers and the pickers’. The makers, whether employees of the broadcaster or indies, pitch their ideas to the pickers who decide what gets made, which writers are in vogue, which actors get cast in the lead role, and which presenters front the show. When it comes to the makers I’ve found BAME representation patchy at best in production, and as far as craft is concerned – you know, cameras, lights, sound, studio crews, costume, makeup etc. - I rarely if ever see a black or Asian face. But when it comes to the pickers, the channel controllers and heads of commissioning who oversee budgets and make the key decisions, here’s what it looks like.

[Pictures on-screen]

How can this be in 2014, and what can we do about it?

Let’s look at TV. Here’s a selection of popular dramas and comedies in recent years. This is what’s going on in the UK. Southcliffe. Yeah, I enjoyed that, that guy shooting people in that West Country village. Of course if it had been in The Ends people would have shot back, right? Broadchurch – mixed race boyfriend of sister of deceased, thank you very much for putting that in there, so there was somebody in there. The Fall was set in Northern Ireland which is rarely seen on TV, Northern Ireland drama, so I guess that was cool. Miranda. I like Miranda, there she is. Mrs Brown’s Boys. The Irish, an ethnic minority? A transvestite, I guess, so that’s a… Discuss. The evolution of BAME involvement in British TV seems to lurch one step forward and two steps back - a bit like John Sergeant on Strictly Come Dancing, except he had a job at the end of it.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Atlantic - this is what’s going down. Scandal. “hold it down.” Grey’s Anatomy. Boardwalk Empire. Breaking Bad. Parks and Recreation. True Blood, “Sookie. Sookie.” New Girl. Elementary, which is their version of Sherlock, I guess. Has the Korean actress Lucy Liu from Kill Bill and Charlie’s Angels playing Doctor Watson. Ooh, very bold decision. There’s as much chance of that happening here - as seeing Charles Saatchi and Nigella Lawson on Mr and Mrs, isn’t there? Could you imagine that here? That’s never gonna happen. So how come Americans manage this almost seamless integration in front of the cameras, whilst here in the UK we find it so difficult?

It’s because they really invest and nurture BAME talent behind the scenes. It’s no coincidence that the Head of Casting at ABC/ Disney who produces Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal and Modern Family is Keli Lee, an Asian-American woman with a vested interest in promoting minority talent. Or that African-American writers like Shonda Rimes are able to write such brilliant three-dimensional characters; whatever race, creed, or colour. Or gender.

Talking of America, it was fifty years ago that Martin Luther King Jnr. made a speech about how America needed to keep to the promise that it made in the Declaration of Independence, that all men are created equal, a promise that America was breaking at the time. In that speech Martin Luther King “Had a Dream”. He dreamt that one day America would fulfil its promise. He dreamt that sons of former slaves and slave owners would sit around a table together. He dreamt that his children would be judged not by the colour of their skin but by their character. That black boys and black girls would join hands with white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers. You all know the speech. I don’t need to go on. It was his way of holding America to account.

Here in the UK we have the BBC and they too have promises in their Charter. Not quite the Declaration of Independence but promises all the same. The BBC Charter promises to “represent the UK, its nations, regions and communities.” They’ve made a pledge to the people of the UK - the license-fee payers - that they will represent them. Well, BAME’s are an integral part of Great Britain’s communities, we deserve to be represented too.

And just like Martin Luther King Jnr., I want to hold our leaders to account.  But I don’t just have a dream Ladies and Gentlemen, I have a screen. I have a screen where great programmes are produced by the multi-cultural many, as opposed to the mono-cultural elite. I have a screen. I have a screen where the actors of the future are cast not by the colour of their skin, but by their talent alone. I have a screen. I have a screen where the stories in our cinemas and on our TVs will reflect the wealth and variety of experience of all our communities, not just some. I have a screen today, can I get a hallelujah?

Audience: Hallelujah.

LH: Now, the thing is… White people down here, “Hallelujah”, right on, Simon, right on. The thing is, we won’t achieve this screen by launching yet another round of training and mentoring initiatives. We need a different solution. So I’ve looked around and tried to find things that have worked in the past, and the answer is right here, in the UK.

Back in 2003, the BBC realised it had a problem, a representational problem. The nations and regions were not getting a look in. According to the BBC’s Annual Report only 3.7% of core programming budget was being spent in Scotland, despite Scotland having around 9% of the UK population. If you looked at the network programmes the BBC produced, 91% of them were being made in and around London. 91%.

So the BBC decided that if it was going to keep its promise in the charter, things needed to change. Now, they didn’t change things by going to local schools in Glasgow and setting up new entrants schemes for the ‘yout dem’. They didn’t give all their staff in Wales mentors - although that could make a good buddy movie, note to self. And finally, they didn’t think they could solve the problem just by increasing monitoring.

No. What they did was structural. First they said they would spend 50% of their money outside of the M25; and for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland they went further, promising them that the proportion of programme spend in each nation, would at least match that nation’s percentage of the UK population. They set firm targets and even set quotas of a minimum amount of programmes they were going to commission from each nation and region. And the result, like Sally Berkow’s alleged drinks bill, is spectacular.

Since 2003 there’s been a massive increase of programmes made outside the M25. There has been a 400% increase in the number of network programmes produced in the English regions. By 2016 over half of network spend will be made out of London. In just two years’ time the amount of network spend in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should accurately reflect the size of the population there. Now that’s an amazing turnaround in increasing regional diversity. It has completely revolutionised the broadcasting landscape. But I think there is another part of the charter promise to be fulfilled. The promise was to represent the UK’s nations, regions and communities. The BBC has kept its promise for the nations and regions but what about communities? More precisely, the BAME communities?

I think they can keep this promise by taking exactly the same approach they took to increasing the output of nations and regions. And that means ring-fencing money specifically for BAME productions. For the nations and regions they set quotas, but I know people don’t like the word ‘quota’, so let’s say ‘ring-fenced money’. Okay, ring-fenced money. If license fee-payers’ money isn’t spent, it will be clear in the Annual Report for each channel. But you know what, I’ve got a feeling people would quickly discover good programmes to spend the money on. But that’s also why it involves appointing a couple of ‘pickers and deciders’, specific commissioners to hunt out internal and external BAME productions to commission.

But what is a BAME production I hear you ask yourself. I’m gonna tell you. Currently Ofcom has three criteria to decide if a production qualifies as coming from the nations or the regions, okay. First, the production company must have a substantive business and production based in the UK outside the M25. Second, at least 70% of the production budget must be spent in the UK outside the M25. And third, at least 50% of the production talent (i.e. not on-screen talent) by cost must have their usual place of employment in the UK outside the M25. A production needs to meet two out of the three to qualify. I believe these criteria can be easily adapted to define a BAME production in the following ways:

A) At least 50% of the production talent (i.e. not on-screen talent) by cost must be Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic. The production staff will be self-declaring about their ethnicity - self-declaration is a common principle in both police, health and other government monitoring of BAME statistics.

B) The production company must be 30% BAME controlled, and/or 30% of senior personnel involved in the production in question must be BAME.

And C) At least 50% of on screen talent by cost must be Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic.

Productions should meet two of these three to qualify.

Now there are more details and copies of this proposal which you'll receive on your way out for you to analyse and hopefully build on. This proposal has been months in the making, drafted by myself and a number of key BAME industry figures, talent drawn from both sides of the camera. We believe everyone stands to gain from this proposal. Everyone. Both culturally and commercially, and if they don’t like it we’re happy to consider their alternatives.

But let’s not just focus on the BBC. This is a problem and solution that relates to the entire industry. All of us. All the major broadcasters have made a promise to BAME people. They’ve signed up to the Creative Diversity Pledge. All except for Channel 5, but let’s not go there. The Creative Diversity Network made a pledge in 2009 in which people signed up to:

• Recruit fairly and from as wide a base as possible and encouraging industry entrants and production staff from diverse backgrounds.
• Encourage diversity in output.
• Encourage diversity at senior decision-making levels.

Like the BBC, the other broadcasters have not been that good at keeping their promises to the BAME communities, but like the BBC, they have kept their promises to represent the nations and regions. Last year half of all Channel 4’s programmes were produced out of London. Half. And Channel 4 spent two fifths of all its money outside London. This isn’t just Shameless or Hollyoaks, this was achieved after Ofcom set specific targets for Channel 4 to meet its license requirement, targets that it has hugely exceeded now.

So what’s the point of all this then? Does this screen, your screen really matter? I put it to you Ladies and Gentlemen, that it does. For many people around the world, the perception of the United Kingdom is determined by our TV exports. Whenever I’m in America, New York or somewhere, and I tell them I’m on TV, they say, “Are you the new Jazz singer in Downton Abbey?” I say, “no, I’m one of the servants working so far below stairs, by the time I get to the house the show’s finished.”

Team GB’s global image should be a fair and honest reflection of our society, not a fictionalised version of who we are. It’s a misrepresentation not to include BAME as major contributors in the television and film industry.  There is a wealth of talent to be tapped. There are writers, producers, executive producers, directors, script editors, skilled technicians who just want to work. When it comes down to it, all we’re asking - is for the broadcasters to keep the promises they have already made to Britain’s communities, either through their charters, license agreements, or when they made the CDN pledge. Right now it feels there are no consequences when promises are not kept. That’s why I’m delighted that the Culture Secretary, Ed Vaizey, has taken such an interest in this area and has promised to make them accountable for delivering on these pledges. Good work, and not before time.

For myself, well I love collaborating, working with new writers and new writing, and I look forward to the challenge of making new high-end drama and comedy to rival the best that’s out there. A bold claim I know, but I did three Jägerbombs and a packet of wine gums before I came on, so you’ll have to excuse me.

Let me leave you now with this quote. It’s from the 3rd of February 2005. Nelson Mandela [coughs], Nelson Mandela, how soon they forget, Nelson Mandela said these words about taking action on world poverty, but this could easily apply to all of us involved in making this great industry more diverse. He said, “Sometimes it falls upon a generation to be great. You can be that generation. Let your greatness blossom.” So why don’t we do that? Every chairman or controller or commissioner or exec in this room? Every H.O.D, production manager and casting director. Every agent. You have it within your power to effect a radical change upon this appalling situation. Let your greatness blossom, and let’s just see how great our generation can be.

Thank you very much for listening, good night."

Posted 18 March 2014 by Tim Dams

Behind the scenes: Live from Space

Live events are now de rigeur for any self respecting TV channel. But Channel 4 takes the trend to a new level (literally) this week, with its Live From Space Season. Produced by Arrow Media, the co-pro with Nat Geo, will culminate with a live two hour broadcast from the International Space Station (ISS) – some 250 miles above Earth.

The season isn’t going to be full of the usual, run of the mill space stories about big rockets or daring landings. The live event will provide viewers with a birds eye view of Earth, which the ISIS orbits every 90 minutes – travelling at 17,500mph. The two supporting films, meanwhile, are classic ob docs that look set to do for astronauts what a series like Coppers did for the police. The docs, for example, are billed as portraits of the day-to-day lives of astronauts and of their back up teams in Houston. 

So we learn how the astronauts sleep, wash and eat in space; how they maintain the ISS; and look at the work and experiments they do while living on the ISS. The difference, of course, is that the cameramen for the live show and the documentaries are the astronauts themselves. Using three Canon XF 305’s, they’ve shot over 20 hours of footage which is being edited together for the pre-recorded films. The cameras will also be used for the live broadcast.

“NASA has never done anything like this before,” says exec producer Sally Dixon, citing “incredible access to the ISS”.

NASA has granted access because it wants to drive awareness of its ongoing work on the ISS, which gets little media attention as it lacks the high octane excitement of space shuttle take offs or the moon landings. As well as airing on C4, Nat Geo is broadcasting the season across its network in 170 countries

Arrow, meanwhile, aims to make a season that’s produced with contemporary TV viewers in mind, and is less corporate than official NASA output. The live show, for example, is presented by The X Factor-host Dermot O’Leary.

For the supporting documentaries, Arrow has encouraged the astronauts to shoot footage like ob doc filmmakers. Instead of speaking direct to camera, in their usual public affairs-like, presenter mode, they’ve been encouraged to let the camera roll. They are filmed as they go about their daily business - while floating in a micro-gravity environment.

And the reality of their lives on board is fascinating: astronauts for example, can’t shower in space so have to wipe themselves clean; when they cut their hair or trim their nails, they have to use scissors attached to a suction hose so the particles don’t float around and get in their eyes; and they have to exercise two hours a day to keep their muscles from wasting away.

Unable to brief the astronauts in person, the Arrow production team has talked to them on the Space Station over the phone – patched into  conference calls to the ISS from their office. Emails are also sent to the astronauts via NASA.  “It’s been incredibly exciting to get phone calls from the the ISS,” says Dixon. “You can’t quite believe that you are speaking to astronauts on the Space Station.”

Astronauts: Living in Space director Janice Sutherland, meanwhile, has also been granted access to the astronauts’ wives, who also help her communicate with the astronauts.

For Sutherland, one of the biggest revelations has been how the astronauts interact with their wives. Communications between the ISS and Earth are good, so they Skype once a week and call every day – usually to talk about everyday matters such as running the house or bringing up their kids.

The production of the live show, meanwhile, will be hugely complex. At any one time, three live video feeds from the ISS will be open for the production team to use. On-board the ISS, there will be live links to astronauts Rick Mastracchio and Koichi Wakata. Presenter Dermot O’Leary, meanwhile, will broadcast from mission control itself, with space veteran Mike Massimino. Also taking part are Professor Stephen Hawking and British astronaut Tim Peake.

The show will take in a lap of the planet, which the ISS orbits every 90 minutes. The astronauts will film from the cupola viewing station of the ISS, providing viewers with a guided tour around the Earth, zooming into various landmarks as they spin round the globe.

Half of the show will make use of pre-recorded segments, as it will be night time for part of the planet. The pre-recorded segments will also be used in case cloud cover obscures the view, and also as a back up if the astronauts have to deal with an incident on the ISS.  It’s live television, after all, so the Arrow team need a back up plan just in case things do go wrong. “We’ve got to be prepared,” says Dixon.      

The Live From Space Season is headlined by a two hour live broadcast from the International Space Station (ISS), Lap of the Planet. Two other films will transmit in the season – Astronauts: Living in Space and Astronauts: Houston We Have a Problem.

Executive Producers, Arrow Media

Tom Brisley, Al Berman & Sally Dixon
Pete Woods
Assistant Producer
Sarah Barker
Live Producer
Sarah Sarkhel
Technical producer
Gayle DePoli
Line Producer
Sean Murphy
Assistant Producers
Sarah Barker, Kate Baller
Sacha Thorpe & Dan Wan
Edit Producer
Lucie Ridout
Dir/Prod, Astronauts: Living in Space
Janice Sutherland
Dir/Prod, Astronauts: Houston We Have a Problem
Sid Bennett
Director, Astronauts: Houston We Have a Problem
Pete Woods
Executive producer, C4

David Glover
Executive Producer, National Geographic
Madeleine Carter

Posted 12 March 2014 by Tim Dams

Televisual Salary Survey 2014 - what do you earn?

Do you want to know how much people earn in this industry? And what the going rate really is for jobs such as a runner, researcher, producer, editor or director? 

Then please take part in Televisual's 21st pay survey, which helps us compile our annual snapshot of what people earn in TV, commercials, film, corporate and digital media. 

Click here to take part.

The full results will be published in Televisual's April 2014 issue and on 

The survey is completely anonymous. We don't ask your name or company and have no way of tracing who responds. 

So please just click here and follow the questions through (it should take you about 2 minutes).   

Many thanks.

Posted 10 March 2014 by Tim Dams
Showing 1 - 6 Records Of 6

About this Author

  • Contributing Editor, Televisual
    Tim Dams is contributing editor of Televis...
  • Total Posts: 6

Recent Posts by This Author



Televisual Media UK Ltd 23 Golden Square, London, W1F 9JP
©2009 - 2017 Televisual. All rights reserved
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use | Disclaimer